View source

[http://pallahensley12.babybloggo.de/1185021/Stem-Cell-Treatment-for-Spinal-Cord-Injuries-The-New-Frontier/ stem cells] hit the limelight in November 1998, after researchers first reported that they had isolated [http://www.incompany.com/blog.php?user=quintennolan25&blogentry_id=673142 stem cell therapy]. These cells, isolated from embryos that have been many days old, can theoretically be differentiated into any sort of cell from the human body, from blood cells to brain cells to muscle cells. This was big news on a scientific front since scientists hoped to use these cells to repair damaged cells and tissue in adult humans. Unfortunately this search breakthrough also made a host of stem cell research problems that are nevertheless becoming debated today. So what's the large fuss about these look for issues? Most in the controversy centers over a reality that the [http://www.purevolume.com/quintennolan25/posts/1379174/Stem+Cell+Therapy+-+Is+it+the+Real+Cure%3F stem cell FAQ] arrive from embryos and scientists have to destroy the embryos to harvest the stem cells. Numerous pro-life and religious groups argue that an embryo represents a human life and that embryonic stem cell jobs is equivalent to murdering human lives. You will find currently several sources of embryos, including aborted fetuses and fertility clinics (which have thousands of unwanted frozen embryos). All of these sources are currently undergoing serious scrutiny from the federal government and many lobbying groups.